Joshi wrote the editorial column Lack of popular support, proper aims and ideals, modern arms and its limit in certain areas, the revolt failed to unite all the classes and unable to take all-India feature. While one group termed it Great Revolt, another group prefer to call it Sepoy Mutiny.
To them, it was a mutiny of some aggrieved sepoys of which some dissatisfied feudal chiefs, native rulers and displaced landlords in the hope of gaining their lost power, took part while the othersselfish to the core and fearful of the British mightrefused to join in.
Probably most significantly, however, was that the rebellion showed that the India could rise up against the British. India was an extremely diverse place inwith Sikhs in the Punjab being extremely different, for example, from Muslim Bengalis or deeply religious Hindu Tamils in the south.
Theoretically, the revolt could not achieve its goal, with the use of superior armaments and proper planning; the colonialists were able to defeat the soldiers and recaptured Delhi.
Due to the anger which was inside the hearts of people because of the steps taken by the East India Company, the revolt saw the participation of a large number of individuals ranging from the Kings and Queens of different states to the peasants and soldiers.
The British concentrated their recruitment in the rural areas. This complete disregard of native customs alienated the nobility who felt that the Company had interfered with a traditional system of inheritance. Whether the British ruled it as a trading company or as a nation, the use of force and military might was still necessary to occupy and subjugate the subcontinent.
This revolt was the one which resulted in uprooting the rule of East India Company from India and the control of Indian administration was passed on to the British crown by the Government of India Act, When soldiers were told to bite into the cartridge, they revolted, as pork is banned in the Islamic tradition and beef in the Hindu religion, and most soldiers were Muslim or Hindu.
However, this event, much like the assassination of Franz Ferdinand to begin the First World War, was merely a catalyst, with preexisting tensions governing how the rebellion was to break out.
This entire rage which somehow marked the beginning of the struggle for the next 90 years for complete independence is correctly called as The First war of Independence.
Tapati Roy in her book, Rani of the Raj told that Rani of Jhansi participated in the revolt to protect her kingdom and her role cannot be equated with any nationalistic fervour. It is here that the national character of the revolt has been questioned because a revolt in order to be national, needs to be organised in modernist terms, must be supported by all classes and should provide an alternative programme of action to overthrow the regime against which it is driven.
The British Government now showed its interest in the political affairs of the country. Ina group of retired British soldiers and civilians, some of them descendants of British soldiers who died in the conflict, attempted to visit the site of the Siege of Lucknow.For what the British sought to derived as a mere sepoy mutiny was India’s First War of Independence Journal-Issues Language-and-Literature News-Analysis.
Sepoy Mutiny or Revolt of An In-depth Analysis 1.
British historians called it a “Sepoy Mutiny” and the Indian historians called it “The First war. Mutiny or War of Independence? Determining the True Nature of the Was it just a sepoy revolt against their higher ranks or a general.
Which of the following was one of Sun Yixian's "Three Principles of the All of the following were causes of the Sepoy Mutiny was a result of the Sepoy Mutiny? Get an answer for 'What caused the Sepoy Rebellion in India? If the Indians had fully accepted British rule, the mutiny would not have happened.
BRITISH REACTION TO THE SEPOY MUTINY, APPROVED: Major /Professor mor Frotessar of History Dean' ot the GraduaGraduat' e ScHooT*.Download